![]() |
|
Posted by PHILIP on March 01, 2001 at 13:02:03:In Reply to: Re: ? mutation found posted by Sebastiaan Overeem on March 01, 2001 at 03:08:59:
Is this the same paper you are speaking of; go to this link
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
then type or paste this number( 11148249 ) and press go
I am still talking to people trying to figure out how to put this in perspective.The abstract was unusualy difficult to put into perspective. I am wondering if just a few people had this particular variation or many, I know Stanford reported a single case of narcolepsy that involved a orexin mutation but that person suffered from narcolepsy starting at age 6months (not your typical case of narcolepsy).
- Re: ? mutation found Sebastiaan Overeem 00:06 3/02/01 (6)
- Re: ? mutation found PHILIP 12:48 3/02/01 (2)
- Re: ? mutation found Crissy 21:32 3/03/01 (1)
- Re: ? mutation found PHILIP 12:15 3/09/01 (0)
- Re: ? mutation found "FUZZY BRAIN STUFF" rip van winkel 03:36 3/02/01 (2)
- Re: ? mutation found "FUZZY BRAIN STUFF" DANY 12:36 3/05/01 (1)
- Re: ? mutation found "FUZZY BRAIN STUFF" rip van winkel 13:52 3/05/01 (0)
Archived Narcolepsy Forum11 viewing only. To post a new topic go to the Narcolepsy Forum Homepage
|
Copyright ©1995-2005 Sleepnet.com., All rights reserved