Posted by westernjoe on November 07, 2012 at 08:24:03:

In Reply to: ENT vs. OMF posted by sleeplessinDenver on November 05, 2012 at 22:53:53:

Yes, there is a lot of treatment bias in this game.

It's not unreasonable to do the protocol from non-invasive towards invasive but for a lot of people (me included) it was a wasted and I would have benefited from going straight to MMA like many others.

My experience is like yours. There are several ENTs out there that thought I was mentally unstable for even considering MMA.
And there were plenty of CPAP pushers who thought I was crazy for having ANY surgery at all.

In the end, you have to make the decision. All we can do is the best we can do.

RA in TX

Follow Ups:

---

Post a Followup

E-Mail  :  required - same address used when you registered (will not show up in posting)
Password:  required (sent to you when you registered)

Subject : Re: ENT vs. OMF

Comments:....note: including your email address here will result in the removal of your posting (See removal policy)

 

PLEASE ONLY CLICK THE SUBMIT FOLLOW UP BUTTON ONCE!!. Thanks, Sandman

---

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Non-CPAP Forum25 ] [ FAQ ]