|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Posted by BS on February 12, 2003 at 20:40:25:In Reply to: Re: scoring tech posted by Up2late on February 12, 2003 at 16:28:45:
In my opinion, and not intended to personally attack others, I'm kind of sick and tired of people carrying on about their low registry ##'s and how hard the old test was, etcetera. Just because someone is #0 or what not does not automatically make them all-knowledgable. Yeah, the old test was likely better, but whether someone passed the old test or the new test should not be used for criteria in deciding who the stronger tech is or who has more knowledge. Our field changes constantly. I know some techs who are brilliant in their profession and have been doing it since the early 80's, and they aren't registered, although they should be. I know some bright students fresh out of PSG school who would put any OTJer or seasoned techs to shame. Let's be careful not to jump to any conclusions here.
- Re: scoring tech RPSGT #1000 and something 20:47 2/12/03 (2)
- Re: scoring tech ol'timer 06:43 2/13/03 (1)
- Re: scoring tech Old Sleeper 09:25 2/13/03 (0)
- IMPORTANT : Information not intended as medical advice. If you suspect that you have a sleep disorder you should seek care from a qualified professional. Read Terms of Use.
- The Sleep Forums are not to be used for commercial purposes.
- Commercial products and services are not endorsed by Sleepnet.com.
- Sleep Deprivation due to Sleep Apnea and insufficient sleep are common and can present as insomnia, narcolepsy, or idiopathic hypersomnia. In infants and children sleep problems commonly present themselves as ADD or ADHD.
Copyright ©1995-2006 Sleepnet.com., All rights reserved